Go slow on Syria I
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Perhaps the president and U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., could take a brief timeout from beating the drums of war by taking in a movie. I would recommend the 1962 classic “Lawrence of Arabia.”
Those who remember the film will recall that Lt. T.E. Lawrence, played by Peter O'Toole, accomplished the unthinkable by uniting the various Arab factions against the Ottoman Turks during World War I. The effort was successful beyond imagination and the Turks were vanquished.
But to Lawrence's dismay and astonishment, the day after their victory, the tribes immediately reverted to their old ways. Any chance of establishing a governing body representative of all Arab peoples faded into the background and was trumped by squabbles over territorial rights and rivalries of status.
The message may have been simplistic, but was nonetheless irrefutable. It was not about doing the greater good for all. It was about power!
Lawrence came to the bitter realization that there were no good guys in this conflict. Our leaders might take this into consideration before walking into the quicksand of Syria.
Russell G. Namie
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Putin’s actions I
- Easily duped Obama fans
- Toomey: No friend of vets
- Springdale’s dysfunction
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Orwellian redefinitions