Share This Page

Agreeing with Putin

| Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Agreeing with Putin

Regarding the editorial “Putin & Syria: What's he up to?” (Sept. 12 and TribLIVE.com): U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey and the Trib are “deeply skeptical” of Russian President Vladimir Putin's peace plan for Syria. I and many others agree with Putin.

We are deeply skeptical of President Obama's assertions that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against his own people and of the highly questionable evidence regarding their use and sources that the government refuses to divulge.

It seems illogical and preposterous that Assad would use them when weapons inspectors were already in the country.

I am also deeply skeptical of politicians and media that refuse to acknowledge that the Cold War is over. The Berlin Wall fell 24 years ago and the Soviet Union dissolved 22 years ago.

Russia and the United States now have a common enemy — radical jihadists, as Putin tried to warn us about with the Tsarnaev brothers (the late and surviving Boston Marathon bombing suspects).

Gerald Schiller

Penn Hills

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.