Parents, not media
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Parents, not media
Hank Baughman's letter “Violent images & crime” (Sept. 16 and TribLIVE.com) made the point that violent television shows, video games and other media are a cause of violent crimes and promote children to behave violently.
I believe this is not the problem. The letter even goes so far as to say: “Those responsible for producing and broadcasting it are a disgrace.”
Most violent shows and video games have a parental warning or rating saying they are not suitable for children. It is the fault of the parent if the child is exposed to such things when they are clearly advertised to be inappropriate for children.
These violent shows are made for mature audiences that understand that what they are seeing is not in any way how they should act. I also believe not all shows containing violence glorify it.
If a person is tempted to commit a violent crime just because he or she saw it on TV, there is a more deeply rooted issue, and it is not the fault of the show for broadcasting it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obstacles to hiring
- Sovereignty trampled
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Math in common?
- About those TV spots I
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Springdale’s dysfunction
- Drought answer?
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II