Unions & liberalism
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Unions & liberalism
Regarding the news story “AFL-CIO president Trumka is calling for liberal alliance” (Sept. 16 and TribLIVE.com): Richard Trumka is either delusional or deceitful. Why would he want to partner with liberal groups to try to turn union membership around?
Blind faith to liberal ideas and concepts is precisely the reason why unions are losing membership and not getting new members. Union workers typically do not trend liberal.
Steelworkers, autoworkers, mine workers, carpenters, iron workers, boilermakers, electricians, police, firemen, etc., are rarely liberals, nor do they subscribe to liberal dogma and policies. These union people are hardworking, self-reliant, patriotic and gun-loving, to name a few things that are anathema to liberalism.
The story states that “(u)nions partnered with student groups to oppose the Vietnam War.” That is simply nonsense!
Union members and their blue-collar brethren were the people who fought the Vietnam War. I recall when construction workers used to harass and rough up the war protesters when the protesters got anywhere near them.
The unions, like any other entity that embraces liberalism, suffer in the end.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Telling facts
- Budget & business taxes
- Strong enough
- Islam & women
- Putin’s actions I
- Slots & property taxes
- Ukraine & history
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Proven success
- Putin’s actions II