President Obama had a speech planned for noon on Sept. 16. When the Washington Navy Yard mass shooting happened at around 8 that morning, he (incredibly) decided to give us that speech instead of postponing it.
After a brief reference to the shooting, which at the time seemed like a terrorist attack on a military installation, he then went on to give us a lecture about banks, Wall Street and the “1 percent” rich people, who he claimed were menacing us.
He claimed that only he could protect us from them and Congress should pass the legislation he wants and punish the “1 percent” with taxes.
Even CNN, usually in Obama's pocket, broke away from the speech and went back to the search for (at the time) two armed men roaming the streets of the capital.
Am I the only one who sees something very wrong here?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.