Published: Sunday, Sept. 29, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
To the ignorant, uneducated parents at Round Hill Park on Sept. 14: The young man I work with was playing on an adaptive playground when your children decided to make him the target of their “play.” They asked what was wrong with him, “shot” him with water guns, yelled at each other to “shoot the nutsy” and poked him with their toy sword — while you sat by, watching and condoning their behavior!
After being appalled by your children's behavior, angry that not one of you did anything about it and hurt for Derek, I realized that he, who has Cri-du-Chat Syndrome, is a better person than you and your children. He thought your kids were playing with him; he was laughing, having fun, when the whole time they were making fun of him.
Derek is an amazing young man who has taught me how to love unconditionally and be patient and understanding. You should be so lucky to have a child like him. But God knew better than to give parents like you someone as special as he is.
I want this letter to remind all parents, not just those at the park that day, to teach their children about disabilities and differences and to make them aware that although children may be “different,” they still want to be liked — to be accepted! Your lack of awareness for persons with disabilities not only hurts them but those who know just how amazing they truly are.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Choosing judges II
- Choosing judges I
- About Quinn & Rose II
- Thanks to our veterans
- Ethanol’s benefits
- Delinquents often the working poor