Media bias detected
Is the Trib becoming more liberal? Not the Opinion page, but the news articles. I know most are not written by Trib reporters, but the stories the Trib editors pick — and, I guess, also write the headlines for — have a liberal slant.
The McClatchy Newspapers story “Health care law divides Republicans” in the Sept. 20 print edition is a good example. It's on Page A4 and not labeled “opinion” or “analysis.” It begins by insinuating that Republicans are out to fool the public. It refers to them as “diehards,” “the no-compromise crowd” and “bitterly divided.” They don't have opponents — no, these kooks have “nemeses.”
The article includes, of course, the warning that polls show the public will blame the Republicans for any government shutdown more than the Democrats. (I read the article several times and couldn't find the part assuring us that the media will do their best to report accurately regarding whom is to blame.) And it certainly wouldn't be a news article if it didn't include quotes that referred to congressional Republicans as “extremists” and “anarchists” who “fear nothing more than losing their seat.” I almost forgot: It also assured us that there's a “GOP Shutdown Watch” to warn us “about Republican behavior.”
The next time an article with such hard-hitting facts lands on the editors' desks, I hope they have the good sense to put it on the Opinion page.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hospital’s hero & more
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- Better in long run
- White House not playing to win
- An Obama clone
- Farewell, my Springdale
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- Unworthy of high office
- Write-in alternative
- Opposed to efficiency?
- Boys, girls & toys