Corbett's common sense
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Some politicians have a basic attitude that “we the people” are too stupid to take care of ourselves. So, enter regulation and a blank government check. What happens? ObamaCare!
Gov. Tom Corbett came out with a commonsense approach to solving the insurance problem for some Pennsylvanians. Right away, no one thinks low-income people have brains to make choices when it comes to their own good! Recipients would share the cost, making choices, and using money for those choices would take on a new meaning for them.
Welcome to the free market that made our country great.
I believe that through no fault of their own, people at times need help with medical care, and our state is successful enough to help those few. I agree with Corbett that by treating people with dignity and realizing they can make choices for their own health care, they will make the best choices for themselves.
Individuals have different needs, and different people can decide how to best fit their situations with the help offered. Not only is Corbett helping the situation with ObamaCare, he is putting in place an exit strategy as well. That to me is the most important piece in the guidelines.
“Bravo!” for Corbett. Pennsylvanians should be proud of his thoughtfulness in this highly charged matter.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s choice
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- Needs sign added
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Slots & property taxes
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Putin’s actions II