It's my God
Since Jim Harger made me a part of his recent letter (“Whose God?,” Sept. 12), I am obliged to make a one-time reply.
I have never met Mr. Harger and am unaware of his religious preference, if any. Unable to make his case to defend homosexuality and abortion, he chooses instead to mock the Christian God, creator of heaven and Earth and all things within.
Man, not God, is responsible for our social ills, Mr. Harger.
I received my religious instruction many years ago at an early age. I learned about the Blessed Trinity, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Bible and the birth and crucifixion of God's only son, Jesus.
I attended public school before our Supreme Court discovered that having God in our schools was unconstitutional. Therefore, I had the advantage of starting the day by reciting the Lord's Prayer.
Guns were plentiful but I don't recall any school shootings. Most boys carried a pocket knife but I don't recall any student being stabbed. I guess we were just lucky.
The closest thing a student had to drugs was a cigarette he smuggled from his dad's pack, just to give it a try. Teenage pregnancy was rare and not worn like a badge of honor as it is today.
God gave us the Ten Commandments, rules to live by. He also gave us a free will. We can obey or disobey his law but I believe at the final judgement we will be held accountable for our actions in this life.
Albert Camus says it best: “I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Atheists & religious expression
- Article painted wrong picture
- Show appreciation
- Fitz draws ire
- Thomas’ ‘humanity’
- ‘Trust’ in God
- Pols’ real interest
- Mitochondrial disease awareness