Wrong on taxation
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Regarding the news story “Pennsylvania Legislature mop-up session to consider pension, school taxes, more” (Sept. 23 and TribLIVE.com): Not so fast, Mr. Turzai!
What the story calls House Majority Leader Mike Turzai's “menu of local taxes for school districts to eliminate property taxes” is unpalatable to business owners. Instead of cutting expenses like he was supposed to, he is slowly but surely seeking more taxes.
And better yet, he is slyly seeking to shift the burden to businesses! That will only hurt small businesses more than anybody.
His menu serves up the earned income tax on individuals. Good. Aren't they the ones using school districts? Businesses don't send people to elementary school.
His high-cholesterol mercantile tax and business privilege tax affect businesses that typically cannot vote in the community where they do business! Better yet, these taxes have to be paid whether or not a business is earning income. So, if the business is struggling, his two main courses put them deeper in the hole.
You may think the property tax is unfair, but at least it is spread across all property owners in a municipality. The business taxes shift all the burden to the businesses.
Have the guts. Make the cuts.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Strong enough
- Telling facts
- Budget & business taxes
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Islam & women
- Invest in pre-K
- Slots & property taxes
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Medicaid’s future
- Zealots’ tactic