Bob Keeler's column on the bishops (“Bishops, get back to basics,” Sept. 27 and TribLIVE.com) is conventional, oh, so conventional, wisdom. Ol' Screwtape, C.S. Lewis' fictional demon, himself could not have served up more poisonous “advice” for the church.
Lack of popularity, lack of interest and embarrassment are not reasons to de-emphasize the message of chastity and monogamy. Extramarital sexual relations have done more damage — emotional, material and spiritual — to the poor than any other societal trend in the last 50 years.
The bishops do not get heard on their “progressive” issues because practicing Catholics, who are inclined to listen to their bishops, are suspicious of almsgiving done at someone else's expense, the core of “progressive” policy.
The bishops are not listening to us either and continue to try to defend our religious rights without defending our property rights.
Linda M. Gourash
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Won’t stop drilling
- Opposed to efficiency?
- Far-left continuation
- Ride-sharing’s advantages
- Echoing Pelosi
- Vandergrift killing Olmsted’s vision
- Lying time of year
- Wrong decision on Harmar church
- No need for Sheetz in Heights
- Taiwan & Hong Kong
- Teachers’ rights