TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Reassessment shocker

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, Oct. 3, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
 

Reassessment shocker

I was reading “Whitehall property value tumbles; owner requests rezoning” (Sept. 26 and TribLIVE.com) to my husband. In the article, the owners, Chuck and Patty Hosler, are having problems selling the property, and the Allegheny County reassessment value is not helping matters.

I found it outrageous that a property that was purchased in 2009 for $72,000 has recently been reassessed at $870,000, although, after appeals, it dropped several times to $243,000.

As I discussed this article with my husband and commented that I wonder what taxes on an $870,000 property are, my husband naively replied that someone would pay taxes on what he actually paid for the property.

One would think that would be the fairest, most accurate way to assess property valuation. Does Allegheny County use such information to adjust fair market value?

Imagine, if you will, being the Hoslers when they opened the letter detailing that $870,000 county reassessment.

Sheila Thomas

Ross Township

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Few buy Confederate flags
  2. Stay safe
  3. Try Hribal as an adult