| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Geneva's ACA objection

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Regarding the news story “Geneva College wrangles with Justice Dept. over Obamacare challenge” (Oct. 2 and As a Geneva faculty member, I find it frustrating that the story obscures the key issue at stake in the college's lawsuit.

The offending paragraph is this one: “Geneva College is challenging an Affordable Care Act requirement that it provide employees with health insurance that covers birth control, including so-called morning-after drugs. The college, which is affiliated with the Reformed Presbyterian Church, claims the requirement violates its religious rights.”

In the mind of the American public, the words “birth control” mainly denote “contraception.” Neither Geneva College nor its sponsoring denomination has any official objection to the responsible use of artificial contraception. The issue is abortifacient drugs and abortion itself.

The story misleads its readers by citing the issue as “birth control.” Then the story merely hints at the real issue — abortion — by mentioning “morning-after drugs.” That's not responsible journalism.

Geneva College's objection to the Affordable Care Act is narrower in scope than the objection raised by the Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic bishops indeed oppose all artificial means of birth control. Reformed Presbyterians and other evangelical Protestants rarely make a similar objection. But the Catholics and evangelical Protestants agree that ending a human life — even one that is still in utero — violates the sanctity of life, the precious gift of a loving God.

Left unchecked, the Affordable Care Act could force Geneva College to become an agent in the taking of innocent human life. That is an intolerable tyranny upon our consciences. That's the real news, not the obscurities that the Trib published.

Byron G. Curtis

The writer is a professor of biblical studies at Geneva College in Beaver Falls.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. More health-care control
  2. Muslims & love of country
  3. A budget in limbo
  4. Inspiration on ice
  5. Indians true victims
  6. Taxing tobacco II
  7. An expensive renovation
  8. Improve diabetes education
  9. Sickened by politicians
  10. Be wary of contractor claims
  11. Taxing tobacco I