Not 'Affordable Care'
Not ‘Affordable Care'
I have a couple of questions for the Obamatons who thought that they were going to get reduced-cost or even free health care insurance because of the “Affordable” Care Act, cheered at its passing and lauded the fact that it was supposedly upheld by the Supreme Court.
• What are you going to do when you use that wonderful insurance and the hospital staff tells you that you're going to have to pay that large co-pay?
• How about when you get the bill for the 20 percent of the total cost of your care? Are you going to pay up? Will you have the money?
• If the answer to the last question is no, do you know who will come knocking on your door to collect? The IRS, which has the power to withhold your income tax return or maybe your Social Security or SSI check.
This may not be happening right now, but you know it will be. Also, now that the ACA is supposedly the law of the land, hospitals and doctors are going to start cutting costs by reducing the amount of testing they do. Unnecessary testing — you know, the testing they do and come across previously undetected ailments and diseases because you didn't have any symptoms.
Ah, no big deal. You're healthy. Right? Good luck!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Being a volunteer firefighter
- PETA & its tactics II
- Bad cartoon
- Uncaring toward soldiers
- PETA & its tactics I
- New Kensington block party thanks
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- It’s not personal