By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The writer of the letter “Debt logic” (Oct. 7 and TribLIVE.com) is correct — raising debt limits does not increase debt. However, that applies to reasonable conservative people or organizations. In the case of our government, history speaks for itself.
Every time the debt limit has been increased, our debt has increased. The reason is that the government has not reined in spending.
Since 2001, the debt limit has been increased 14 times and our debt has increased from approximately $7 trillion to almost $17 trillion, and it continues to rapidly rise, with estimates of $21 trillion by the end of 2014.
Isn't it time for someone to step up and demand that our government rein in spending and waste? Keep in mind that this burden is being placed on our children and their children.
As voters and patriots, we should be demanding reduced spending through our representatives. If an individual went on a similar spending spree, that person's credit would be blocked and stopped.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Funding priorities questioned
- Medicaid’s future
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Slots & property taxes
- Legal marijuana
- Good use of slots money
- Drought answer?