Shared Ride problems
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Nov. 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I am writing in regard to the Senior Shared Ride Program in Westmoreland County.
I help my aunt, who lives in Vandergrift, with scheduling medical appointments, and she depends on this service. But things rarely work out. The Westmoreland County Transit Authority has told us to be patient, but how patient must we be? How long before the problems are corrected?
When we call to make the cab appointments, we usually are kept on hold for at least 15 minutes. When we reserve a ride, they want us to schedule a return time. Anyone who has spent time in doctors' offices knows you don't know when you'll be done.
My aunt used Byers Cab Service for years and didn't have many problems. Now the transit authority runs the program and tells Byers what to do.
They're giving Byers a bad name.
I talked with a supervisor, but she talked in circles. I told her I'd call the county commissioners and my state representative. She said to go ahead and call. She was very arrogant.
I urge all seniors who use the Senior Shared Ride Program to start complaining if you haven't already. You do not deserve this type of service.
Barbara (Bowman) Miller
The writer is formerly from Vandergrift.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Enslaving themselves
- Lebo’s coyotes
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence
- Behavior counts
- Guzzardi for guv
- Saved her life