Wrong on O'Brien
Re. the letter “Re-elect O-Brien” (Oct. 8) from Schuylkill County Clerk of Courts Stephen Lukach Jr.: With all due respect, Mr. Lukach needs to get his facts correct.
On March 27, 2012, the VND story “County agency to extend service” quoted Ms. O'Brien as stating she had no plans to extend business hours in the Westmoreland County prothonotary's office.
The truth is, only after Republicans Mike Powers and Carl Stepanovich campaigned for prothonotary on offering credit card payments for court fees and extended office hours did O'Brien act. Did O'Brien initiate these changes solely to save her job?
I'm voting for Mike Powers because he's an honest, hardworking young man who has proven to be a true leader in the county in his work for candidates.
I worked with Mike when he was executive director of the Westmoreland County Republican Committee and when he worked for the Tom Smith campaign for U.S. Senate. Mike knows how to roll up his sleeves and work hard for the taxpayers. He's not going to accept a pension.
Is on-the-job training bad, as Lukach said? Memo to Lukach: I've learned more from real-world, on-the-job experience than I ever did in graduate school.
Chad A. McCutcheon
The writer is a Westmoreland County Republican committeeman.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.