By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I first met Westmoreland County Clerk of Courts Bryan Kline through our bipartisan statewide association. Though we share Republican political affiliation, more importantly, we share a common cause: to increase collections of costs, fines and/or restitution owed by criminal defendants to crime victims and taxpayers.
Together we served on the Restitution in Pennsylvania Task Force, where he contributed experience and insights gained from his collections enforcement efforts in Westmoreland County.
Bryan's office modeled the best practices advocated by the task force, including suspension of driver's licenses for failure to pay (more than 500 to date), accepting credit-card payments online and partnering with the bench to establish a collections court.
The results speak for themselves. In 2009, prior to Bryan taking office, annual collections were at $4.5 million; they soared to almost $5.4 million last year.
Further demonstrating his leadership, Bryan obtained the approval of the prison board to make 20-percent inmate account deductions, ensuring victims of crime need not wait until their offenders are released to start receiving justice.
I urge the voters of Westmoreland County to keep your clerk of courts on the job and collecting for you. Vote for Bryan Kline on Nov. 5!
The writer is the York County clerk of courts.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns II
- Knives vs. guns I
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- Valley musical superb
- The Obama Doctrine I wonder …
- Consequences in space
- In tragedy’s wake II
- Resurrection? Really?