Published: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Initially, I thought the reason for all the public-impacting measures the administration has taken during the shutdown was the expectation that we would buy the Democrat/media mantra that it was a “GOP shutdown” and act accordingly in the next election.
However, the unnecessary, cruel and even costly nature of these actions (barring World War II vets from their memorial, closing the Normandy cemetery, closing rent-paying concessions on federal land, using Gestapo tactics on senior bus-trippers in Yellowstone, refusing Arizona's offer to pay for Grand Canyon operations, evicting Lake Mead homeowners, preventing military chaplains from performing religious services for free, etc.) have convinced me this is something more sinister.
President Obama has decided it's time to find out how far down the road to serfdom we've gone. He had already learned that Congress will spinelessly accede to any unconstitutional actions he takes. It now seems there is nothing he can do that will provoke the general populace to do more than complain among themselves (and to their impotent “representatives”) and attend easily ignored demonstrations.
I fear he is learning exactly what he had hoped for — we are nearly at the end of that road.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare Obamination
- Failing patients & public
- Maybe problem is kids
- Menace unaddressed
- Choosing judges I
- Name game
- Forcing their beliefs
- Choosing judges II
- Legacy: All lose
- Zubik is right
- Promotion questionable