TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Pooling wanted

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
 

The editorial “Forced Utica shale pooling? Change the law” (Oct. 9 and TribLIVE.com) on Utica shale integration highlighted a single landowner but overlooked the 98 percent of my friends and neighbors in the leasing unit who support Hilcorp's plan to protect and preserve our right to develop our land.

The facts are that this plan will ensure efficiency, maximizing production while minimizing time, traffic and land disturbance. Without this responsible plan in place, more wells would be drilled over a longer period to properly develop our land.

Also, despite the false impression that the editorial left readers with, not one square inch of Bob Svetlak's surface land will be used or impacted if the application is granted.

Pennsylvania's Environmental Hearing Board has a detailed process in place to balance the various rights and interests of all stakeholders.

Development affects the entire community, so what right does any one individual have to dictate that we use more land, tolerate more traffic and lose economic activity when he will see no impact to his surface land?

Simply put, without integration, 98 percent of us will see less benefit from the activity in our community. That means more uncertainty for landowners, dramatically impeding their right to develop their land as they see fit.

Jody Clingan

Pulaski Township

Lawrence County

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. More health-care control
  2. Muslims & love of country
  3. Trump: Stealing the thunder
  4. A budget in limbo
  5. Wolf’s budget better
  6. Indians true victims
  7. Be wary of contractor claims