My fellow commissioners should consider my less-costly plan to address our jail issues rather than their $32 million construction on our Fayette County Fairgrounds.
To free up existing jail space, we could purchase one or two buildings downtown to relocate the female inmates permanently and the jail administrative staff, along with inmate programs and storage.
We could build on our existing site or adjacent land another annex or pods like neighboring counties, and we should consider purchasing the former city jail, demolishing it and using the land. We should make repairs and renovations to the existing jail.
As the Department of Corrections confirmed, many jails across Pennsylvania are not fully ADA compliant and still operate. In addition, we should embrace the DOC's and National Institute of Corrections' recommendations to implement an Inmate Jail Cleaning Program and a Building Maintenance Plan for the existing jail.
We should implement a work-release program and an alternate housing program like our neighboring counties.
We should allow the three treatment courts to work, considering the courts recently hired a person to coordinate the programs.
And we should allow our new Day Reporting Center to take effect, given it opened less than 45 days ago and has 26 active inmates with 10 inmates waiting processing.
The writer is a Fayette County commissioner.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steel at stake, too
- Pedro must go
- Duty to disclose
- Oberdorf firing
- Beware this Wolf II
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Beware this Wolf I
- Easy to achieve