Share This Page

Too fast for Turnpike

| Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Regarding the news story “Pa. Senate leader wants to raise speed limit on highways, turnpike” (Oct. 12 and TribLIVE.com): Apparently, Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson, has never been on the Pennsylvania Turnpike while going around a sharp curve with nine 18-wheelers surrounding him.

We used to travel on the turnpike often to visit family. When the speed limit was first changed to 55 mph, we felt safer. Then, when it was changed back to 65 mph, we were disappointed.

My husband and I always drive the speed limit and we have encountered many people with road-rage on all roads, wanting us to speed up. We've had fists shaken at us, people passing us on double yellow lines, people tailgating us — and that's at the speed limit.

Yes, we have traveled on many highways that are very safe at 70 mph, but the Pennsylvania Turnpike is not one of them.

Twenty years ago, I was almost killed by a speeding pickup truck. Now, the roads are even more dangerous, with texting, cellphones, angry drivers, people anxious to get to work or home from work.

I think all the speed limits should be lowered, not raised, because people still feel they're safe to avoid a ticket when driving 5 or 10 mph over the limit.

Ann Hall

Conway

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.