Sundays & hunting
Sundays & hunting
A common topic around this time of year in Pennsylvania is hunting on Sundays. The state Game Commission and lawmakers do not allow hunters to shoot game on Sundays.
Deer hunting in this part of the country is one of the top activities and allows the state to make a ton of money off selling licenses and stamps to hunters.
The vast majority of those in the field are working adults. They put in their 40-plus hours a week and get only one opportunity to take a buck per week. That equates to six days during archery season. So, why not allow hunting on Sundays to double the opportunities?
Many people believe it has to do with blue laws and respecting the Lord's day. While this may be a part of it, the real reason is farmers.
A lot of land hunted on in Pennsylvania is owned by farmers, and this allows them to make certain demands. They do not want gunshots ringing out while they are trying to enjoy their only day off for the week. While I respect this aspect, this is a solvable problem.
Here's the plan: Allow hunting on Sundays, archery only, and end hunting at noon. This solves all the issues, but if farmers still do not go for it, why not even restrict Sunday hunting to certain counties?
Allegheny and a couple other counties already have special seasons to reduce the deer herd, so why wouldn't this be a good idea?
Justin J. Bandurski
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Miss Penney’s catalog
- GOP: Integrity
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks
- Boys, girls & toys
- Corbett, the reformer
- Failing to lead
- Not clean enough
- Better choice
- Echoing Pelosi
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- Behind tax inversions