Disappointed by Toomey, Rothfus
It is disheartening to see that U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey and Rep. Keith Rothfus voted against raising the national debt level and reopening federal agencies. Both apparently did not have the welfare of the citizens of Pennsylvania in mind when they voted.
If the Republicans' flawed strategy to not raise the debt limit would have won, we would've faced a scenario in which Social Security payments would have stopped in November, many federal government services would have ceased and unthinkable harm would have been done to the American financial markets.
I guess Toomey and Rothfus were being led by the nose by that astute Harvard grad Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. I'll be interested to see the rationalization for their vote — if they answer a citizen's letter protesting their vote this week.
We need people in Congress who are problem solvers, not obstructionists.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.