The polls show Republicans have damaged their brand with the government shutdown and near-default. Well, since their brand has been obstructionism for the past six years, I think the brand is doing just fine.
But, as a lifelong Republican, this is not what I signed on for back in the early 1970s.
I used to declare with pride that I stand with the party of Lincoln. But I think Abraham Lincoln would be appalled at what we have become. I am as well.
I became a Republican mainly because I truly believed that we stood for something. Now, I am not sure I can stomach what we have come to stand for.
I hope we come to our collective senses. For one, I would like the tea-party element to go off and form its own party. Stop hijacking mine.
Give my party back to people who can and do think about realities and the rule of law, which the Affordable Care Act really is. Give my party back to people who understand and care about consequences as well.
I want to be a proud Republican again!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- No ‘pass’ for Obama
- Right to veto
- Why the difference?
- Pa.’s ‘safety laws’
- Arnold must cut police force
- More than one hero
- Being a volunteer firefighter
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- The next wave?
- PETA & its tactics II
- PETA & its tactics I