A duck tale
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Oct. 31, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
My wife and I were among the thousands who made the pilgrimage to Point State Park to see the Rubber Duck. We were pleased we had made the effort, despite the bad leg that she has. Friends lent us a handy wheelchair that made it all possible.
We parked in a nearby garage and I pushed her to the site. We were just amazed at the crowd streaming to and from the wharf — all sizes, all ages, all well-mannered.
A couple of times, I had difficulty getting the wheelchair over some sidewalk imperfections. Immediately, some men or teenage boys grabbed the armrests and lifted the chair over the bumps.
All they saw was a need that they could satisfy. All they cared about was that they could help us get to or from the Rubber Duck. All we could do was thank them.
While watching TV news about the Rubber Duck leaving town, I thought of a “thank you” that the duck would understand. If some similar artist would construct on the wharf a huge nest and place in it a proportionately sized yellow egg, it would sort of thank the Rubber Duck for coming and tell it that we would like another, just like it, to take its place soon.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Valley musical superb
- Cover many stances
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- Stabbings reveal heroics
- Help our veterans
- Resurrection? Really?