Share This Page

Hold tax deadbeats accountable

| Sunday, Oct. 27, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

I pay taxes when due on properties I own in the Highlands School District. Many people do not pay at all. It is especially offensive when the property owner who does not pay is a school board member. The board is elected to administer a $38 million budget for Highlands residents, and yet, some cannot budget their own personal finances. This is not unlike police Chief (Nate) Harper and his misappropriation of tax money in the city of Pittsburgh. I call it theft.

In the next election, Mr. Ronald Lang of 9th Avenue in Brackenridge will be running again for the Highlands School Board, unopposed! Mr. Lang is a bar owner who has been delinquent on his school taxes for several years. He has also been sent to a board convention in the state of California at a taxpayer cost in excess of $3,000. He received these perks while owing the district over $30,000.

Do not vote in the election for Mr. Lang, but call him and demand he drops out of controlling your public dollars and abides by the same rules that he demands you follow.

Contact all of your board members and demand that they work on an aggressive campaign to collect back taxes before they raise yours to make up for the deadbeats. Their contact info is on the school webpage. Find them at: www.goldenrams.com

Mr. Lang, just pay your taxes!”

Rhonda Russell

Frazer

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.