The public's say
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Nov. 1, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
The public's say
At the Oct. 12 Ten Commandments dedication, we watched hundreds standing in the middle of a street near the South Connellsville Fire Department dedicate God's word for all to see.
We have seen a school district decide to take a stand, more than 5,000 Ten Commandments signs have been sold, 7,000 names have been placed on petitions, nine granite monuments have been placed around our county and on Nov. 9 one will be dedicated in Washington County.
Because one person objected to the 1957 Ten Commandments monument at the Connellsville Junior High, residents have been awakened. We are offended because it is God's word. It also is the free-speech rights of the members of the Fraternal Order of Eagles who placed the Decalog, the students, the citizens of Connellsville, Nomalville, Dunbar, Dunbar Township, Bullskin Township, South Connellsville, White, Juanita and every other town in Connellsville Area School District to keep the commandments there. This county is made up of mostly Christians who will not back down, will not sit down and cower to some bully telling us that we cannot tell our children about the Christian heritage of the United States.
A Ten Commandments dedication/freedom speech rally is scheduled Saturday at Paradise United Methodist Church, 105 Hoke St., Bullskin. The day's events will begin at 5 p.m. with the dedication.
The Rev. Marietta Ewing
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Budget & business taxes
- Strong enough
- Telling facts
- Invest in pre-K
- Medicaid’s future
- Math in common?
- Islam & women
- Costco over Wal-Mart
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable