Tea party should leave GOP
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Nov. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Moderate Republicans and RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) complain that the tea party wing has hijacked the party. I know exactly how they feel and I have no sympathy for them.
For more than 20 years, moderate Republicans have controlled the party. They differ very little from the Democrats in ideology and voting. They are afraid to defend the fundamental values of their party.
Conservatives — the true Republicans — are given this advice: “Hold your nose and vote Republican. We hear you and we're changing. If you split the party vote, the Democrats win.”
I'm tired of holding my nose. I'm tired of waiting for the moderates to change. There are true conservative candidates in the party. I will vote only for them.
Moderates and RINOs need to hold their noses and vote for tea party candidates, supporting their party even if they don't agree.
I wish the tea party would break away from the Republican party. If they put up their own plank of true conservative candidates, I would vote for them.
The Grand Old Party is doomed. Maybe from its ashes, just like the Phoenix, the tea party will rise. That would be bad news for Democrats.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- Medicaid’s future
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Not reviled abroad
- Saved her life
- Prison plan & the public’s say