The Fed's failings II
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
In reporting about a Ponzi schemer, a journalist who wrote only about the net benefits to early investors would be properly accused of journalistic malpractice.
So, I was surprised by the front-page print placement and the 20 paragraphs given to The Associated Press news story “Fed will continue bond-buying policy” (Oct. 31 and TribLIVE.com) without it once noting where the money comes from to buy these bonds.
Nor did the story bother to mention the danger of asset bubbles, growing inequality of wealth or meager economic impact attributed to the Fed's quadrupling of the monetary base since 2008.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Deer Lakes drilling OK
- Paying for ‘Fayette’s Folly’
- Tragedy’s ramifications II
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- Resurrection? Really?
- Sign on to save Springdale
- Not believable
- Amazing support
- The Obama Doctrine I wonder …
- Dems’ tax myth