TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Poor tax policy

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
 

Poor tax policy

Regarding the news story “Lawmakers think drink tax could save struggling Pennsylvania cities” (Oct. 27 and TribLIVE.com): The proposed expansion of drink taxes beyond Allegheny County and Philadelphia to 21 other municipalities, like most “sin” taxes, is unlikely to raise the revenue its proponents expect while having a negative effect on local businesses.

Relying on sin taxes has proven to be poor tax policy due to being notoriously unreliable and regressive, and because they are often used to prop up increased spending.

Sin taxes often have strong detrimental effects on local small businesses, with consumers seeking to avoid the tax by voting with their feet and buying products outside the city imposing the tax.

Sin taxes should be avoided because they distort the market and encourage unsustainable increases in government spending while placing an unnecessary burden on lower-income taxpayers.

Instead of creating and increasing discriminatory taxes, cities across Pennsylvania should focus on tax reform that lowers rates and puts dollars back into taxpayers' pockets while tightening their own belts by creating new, reasonable limits on spending.

Matthew Glans

Chicago

The writer is a senior policy analyst at The Heartland Institute (heartland.org).

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. AG’s office no place for porn
  2. Don’t forget Highmark patients
  3. Perk in peril?
  4. Beyond wacky
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.