By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The U.S. Labor Department, whose statistics are used to set the annual Cost-of-Living Allowance for Social Security recipients, needs to tell us where it shops. According to its report, the total increase in food, housing, clothing, transportation, energy, medical care, recreation and education is 1.5 percent (story, “Social Security checks will inch up in January,” Oct. 31).
As a senior citizen on a fixed income, I call bull. Everything has gone up much more than 1.5 percent where I shop.
I don't believe the report one bit. Having shopped for life's essentials for at least 57 years, I choke on this lie. How much of a raise did officials in the Labor Department and the rest of the politicians get?
It is time for a major change in this country. Do not vote for the incumbents; we need to replace all of them.
Then maybe, just maybe, we will get a few new people elected who will read and obey the Constitution. They will look out for the people who made this country a great place to live and be someone who will look us in the eye and tell the truth.
Wow, I must be dreaming.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Putin’s actions II
- Putin’s actions I
- What competition?
- Conspicuous by absence
- Needs sign added
- Sovereignty trampled
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I