By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, Nov. 17, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
In The Associated Press news story “Life beyond Earth just got more likely” (Nov. 5 and TribLIVE.com), I was taken aback by a comment from a co-author of a study that found there likely are billions of Earth-like planets: If we aren't alone, why is “there a deafening silence in our Milky Way galaxy from advanced civilizations?”
The story says the Milky Way has at least 8.8 billion Earth-like planets and more habitable planets than there are humans living on Earth. I find it amazing that mainstream media and science ignore the more than 10,000 UFO reports filed each year with organizations such as the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON). NASA, SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and our Defense Department will concede that there has to be life in space but won't admit it is already here.
Every Roper or AOL poll that I have seen reports that 14 percent of Americans have seen a UFO and 3 percent believe they have been abducted by aliens. That amounts to millions of witnesses. In a recent Trib daily poll, six of seven respondents said they believe in UFOs.
MUFON has 75,000 UFO reports on file with pictures, radar, sonar and witness testimony. This is the same type of evidence that would hold up in a court of law.
I believe the more pertinent question is: Why won't our government disclose the truth regarding UFOs? Is it about acquiring the technology or is there a more sinister explanation to “their” motives on Earth?
The writer is Pennsylvania's MUFON state director.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Putin’s actions II
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Obstacles to hiring
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Putin’s actions I
- Math in common?
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Not reviled abroad
- Keep Laurel Point