Why two Americas
It has been observed that we are becoming two Americas. That corporate profits are soaring amid a weak job market and continuing struggle for many further evidences this phenomenon. Yes, there are two Americas — those who are continually learning, creating more, stretching and challenging themselves more, being, doing and having more; and those who are continually demanding more be given to and done for them.
The divide is along the lines of those who take more responsibility for their lives, circumstances and futures, and those who cede that responsibility to others. People in the former group live larger and larger while those in the latter experience more frustration and hardship. How can it be a mystery that giving up responsibility for one's own life results in less control and fewer options?
It is a monumental crime that politicians and others enable and encourage millions to give away responsibility for their own lives, thus giving up control, power, options and the opportunity for growth. And the only solution offered is more of the same: Give up even more responsibility and become smaller still — shameful. Politicians have destroyed the potential of untold millions in their unquenchable lust for power.
This is the story behind soaring corporate profits amid a weak job market and widespread struggle and hardship. There is no sign that the trend will be reversed; rather, it will progressively continue.
J. Frank Jad
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- An Obama clone
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- Unworthy of high office
- Farewell, my Springdale
- Teachers unions & governor race II
- Hospital’s hero & more
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- Better in long run
- White House not playing to win
- Write-in alternative
- Behind tax inversions