Labor unions used to cooperate and support shared goals of better working conditions and increased benefits for members. There has been a noticeable change in that policy recently.
The United Mine Workers of America found that even though it supported President Obama and gave him money and union votes, it ended up getting the shaft. Through his Environmental Protection Agency, Obama began his war on the coal industry.
The EPA forced coal-fired power plants to shut down and put new, massive restrictions on surface mining, costing union jobs. The UMW finally had enough and went to D.C. to protest these devastating policies.
And where was the support for the UMW from the other unions that blindly condoned all of Obama's policies? Where was the brotherhood? Their silence was pretty revealing.
The least they could have done was give the UMW some friendly advice: The last miner out of the coal mine, please turn out the lights!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Positive & healthy ...
- Thanks for the coverage
- Hiring in Westmoreland I
- Sticker shock
- More answers, please
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Russia, not Rice
- Ferguson & contradictions
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Blame judges
- Article painted wrong picture