Letter writer is a bully
This is in response to the letter “Try volunteering” (Nov. 2).
As a VND customer for many years, I enjoy reading the letters to the editor section. Some writers often make very good points and are very uplifting. We can all benefit from positive, uplifting and informative articles.
But the letters written by the author of “Try Volunteering” have stood out, as she makes obvious personal attacks on the writers of the letters she references. No matter what the previous writer's subject was, she finds a way to make a personal attack.
I feel sorry for anyone who gains satisfaction from this type of bullying. As a retired teacher, I witnessed this in schools from children, but to see an adult behave this way disgusts me.
There is nothing wrong with a difference of opinion, but this writer is concerned only with attacking someone else's character.
I don't enjoy reading such negative, childish personal attacks that have nothing to do with the original writer's subject matter. Shouldn't the VND weed out this type of “junk mail”?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Tax hits seniors
- Corbett better choice
- Thanks to searchers
- HUD & Larimer
- Who’s responsible?
- Ex-Im & Westinghouse
- Wolf & ObamaCare
- Clueless on law
- Off base on Chatham prez
- Expanding their options