Ferlo & Natrona
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Ferlo & Natrona
The members of Natrona Comes Together are sad and sorry that our good friend, state Sen. Jim Ferlo, has announced he will not seek re-election.
Nine years ago, we approached the senator about the declining quality of life in Natrona. Ferlo suggested we start small: an event to command attention and have a big community impact such as a town cleanup.
On a rainy, miserable day, NCT staged its first cleanup. Ferlo arrived with several Dumpsters, rolled up his sleeves and worked for hours in the pouring rain. We removed literally tons of tires, car parts, wood and waste from Natrona that day. We were shocked by the overwhelming community turnout but realized, “We can take our town back.”
Thousands of volunteer hours later, NCT has accomplished much — a crime-watch program, canoe launch, community garden, new housing, concerts and festivals and an awesome new playground. Among our proudest accomplishments are our Summer Education Programs, which focus on reading, art and sports for children.
Many would not have happened without Sen. Ferlo. He is a visionary, a man of the people and does what he believes is right, regardless of political ramification. I'm honored to have worked with him. He's leaving a huge legacy in Natrona; I can't imagine what this community would be like today without his support.
The senator still has another year in office. But when his term has ended, he'll always be welcomed by his friends in Natrona.
The writer is the president of Natrona Comes Together.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Funding priorities questioned
- Putin’s actions I
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Conspicuous by absence
- Drought answer?
- Not reviled abroad
- Saved her life