Zubik is right
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Dec. 7, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Regarding the efforts by Pittsburgh Bishop David Zubik to protect our faith from government overreach: I commend Bishop Zubik for balancing his legal efforts to defend conscience decisions and caring for those in need.
The Pittsburgh Diocese under his leadership responds immediately to disasters. The Catholic Charities Clinic is a wonderful outreach service, as are the many parish ministries to the needy.
I would rather see some money be used for the legal process to establish defense of conscience — hopefully once and for all — instead of for fines that will be even more costly.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s budget claim
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Orwellian redefinitions
- Keep Laurel Point
- Stalin, Hitler, now Putin