Share This Page

Eagles' plight

| Saturday, Dec. 7, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

I was appalled after reading The Associated Press news story “Eagle victims of wind farms get justice” (Nov. 24 and TribLIVE.com) that a company can apply for a permit to kill a bald eagle.

A symbol of the USA and the only eagle unique to North America, the bald eagle is a symbol of freedom; it appears on the presidential seal and the classic American quarter.

As reported in the story, at least 67 bald and golden eagles have been killed by wind turbines since 2008.

Now the Fish and Wildlife Service has announced, with the approval of the Obama administration, that it is issuing a “take permit” for “recurring eagle mortalities” to companies operating wind farms. The permit defines “take” as “pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest, or disturb ... .”

And “disturb” is further defined as “to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes ... injury,” “a decrease in its productivity” or “nest abandonment.”

This is just another example of how far the Obama administration will go to “fundamentally change” to appease its political base.

Ed Liberatore

Turtle Creek

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.