Regarding the news story “Head of Allegheny County's air quality program named to new deputy health director post” (Nov. 26 and TribLIVE.com): We all would like to see Allegheny County Health Department people promoted based on aggressive (not passive) performance and accomplishment.
Given that a University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health report says Allegheny County air quality is cancerously seated somewhere in the top 2 percent in the United States for risk (due to air pollution that makes us sick or worse and that we read about in a host of stories), someone independently needs to see if these kinds of promotions are merited or even make good health sense, and what we are doing to get off that top-2-percent level.
The Allegheny County Health Department needs corrective action, not promotion.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- Hospital’s hero & more
- An Obama clone
- White House not playing to win
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- Better in long run
- Working hard in fast food
- Unworthy of high office
- Farewell, my Springdale
- Write-in alternative
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks