Highlands No. 1 in unpaid taxes
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Regarding the story “A-K Valley schools owed $32 million in back taxes” (Nov. 24): The Highlands School District ranks No. 1 out of 15 local school districts with the highest percentage of unpaid taxes compared to the overall budget. This is not a reflection of the educational system but a sad fact of poor community tax support.
After information on tax delinquencies appeared in the VND and on TV news, I received emails of condemnation from two board members — Laura Thimons and Carrie Fox. Thimons accused me of making slanderous statements, but the information I used is public and I obtained it from the Highlands administration.
Board President Fox chided me for helping to bring “bad press” to the district. The bad press is a result of unpaid taxes and deadbeat taxpayers.
The public has a right to know if elected officials live up to their obligations as responsible community members.
In this case, these two board members can't see it is their moral obligation to the voters and students to take charge of this economic concern.
The writer owns property in the Highlands district.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Putin’s actions I
- Putin’s actions II
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Math in common?
- Saved her life
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Drought answer?
- Proven success