By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Nov. 29, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
I am urging my colleagues in the Pennsylvania General Assembly to make sure minors can't purchase electronic cigarettes.
I have introduced a bill to make it crystal clear to Pennsylvania residents and retailers that e-cigarettes should not be sold to anyone under the age of 18. Most Pennsylvanians don't realize that the laws that apply to the sale of traditional cigarettes do not apply to electronic cigarettes. My legislation would fix that.
As e-cigarettes have grown in popularity — particularly among individuals trying to switch from regular cigarettes — I decided to make sure that minors cannot get their hands on this product. Many retailers do not know how to monitor and regulate the purchase of e-cigarettes at their stores. This legislation is direct, to the point, with no ambiguity.
This product is for adults only. E-cigarettes could prove to be a useful tool for adult smokers to quit using tobacco. While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is still considering regulations on e-cigarettes, more than half of the states already have outlawed sales to minors. Pennsylvania should quickly join them to prevent use of any nicotine products by our children.
I urge Pennsylvanians to join with me and call on their state senators to move Senate Bill 1055 and vote to protect our children.
The writer is a Democrat state senator from Canonsburg, Washington County.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Putin’s actions I
- Lebo’s coyotes
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence
- Guzzardi for guv
- Funding priorities questioned