Don't hold your breath
Late November brought final word: JPMorgan Chase has “settled” civil charges with federal regulators to the tune of $13 billion. Amazingly, the company actually admitted wrongdoing. While the Obama Department of Justice “holds open the door” to possible criminal action, nothing of the kind is yet seen respecting the antics at the highest levels of bank management and/or at any of those Wall Street financial houses.
Regarding this situation, comment spoke of the difficulties involved in bringing criminal prosecution in such cases. Are there problems with the law? If so, how come, when it seems easy enough for Congress to create myriad criminal statutes? Why is it so difficult to prosecute the “anointed ones,” those who seem to float grandly beyond the reach of the laws — laws that govern the actions of us mere mortals? Think our vaunted “lawmakers” might have appropriate answers? Think the media might lend a hand posing such questions?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Inconsistent Wolf
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Watson in 33rd
- Gross in 45th
- Coal’s biggest threat
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- ObamaCare solution
- Wolf is the right choice
- Chamber’s choice