Best to not regulate
In response to the column “ That phrase we dare not speak: It's time for the courts to value sexual pleasure ” (Dec. 1 and TribLIVE.com): While Margo Kaplan raises several valid points about the schizophrenic nature of our laws governing sexual behavior, her prescription for treating those problems is downright frightening.
It would seem appropriate to liberty in our society to eliminate laws that regulate sexual behavior between consenting adults. Frankly, as long as the behavior is consensual and the participants are adults, government has no business in our bedrooms.
What Ms. Kaplan advocates, however, is that “(v)aluing sexual pleasure honestly would require us to regulate it more honestly.” Given government's performance in most matters, do we really want government to regulate, or courts to define, behavior between consenting adults in any way?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- For their own benefit
- Give thanks for vets
- Voting insanity
- Bible under attack
- Gruber, then & now I
- Postal questions
- Family first
- Gruber, then & now II
- EPA impoverishing seniors
- ‘Change’ promise kept
- Not ‘too stupid’