By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, Dec. 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I read the “Distressing pensions” item in “ Greensburg Tuesday takes ” and it reminded me of the news story “ Jeannette seeks to fund pension deficit ” about council planning to raise Jeannette's earned-income tax.
What is wrong with these people? Several years ago, they raised our earned income tax rate to 1.15 percent to help their financial problems, which did not help. Now, they want to raise it to 1.5 percent and punish the few people in Jeannette who are working residents. Seriously!
Knowing the debt the city has, I don't think raising this tax will put a dent in it or solve the debt. The city wasted money for the state to evaluate it and then did not listen to a word the state said. Residents in Jeannette have dealt with a lot of monetary increases — sewage fees, school taxes yearly , garbage fees — over the past couple years, and now this!
How much do they think the working residents can take in order to survive? Jeannette is not a large city and if Detroit can file bankruptcy, why can't we? Let's hope Mayor-elect Richard Jacobelli listens to the people and the state recommendations.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Saved her life
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Wildlife & humans
- Conspicuous by absence
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Guzzardi for guv
- Backing sheriff
- Drought answer?