Beyond dogs & cats
A bill passed by the Pennsylvania House and sent to the Senate that would make it illegal to slaughter cats and dogs for meat, HB 1750, will likely pass with flying colors — and for good reason. People realize that taking the lives of these intelligent, sensitive animals so we can eat their flesh is wrong.
But what about the other intelligent, sensitive animals whose lives we claim for no other reason than to have the fleeting taste of their flesh?
People who have spent time with pigs often compare them to dogs because they are friendly, loyal, smart, playful and love to explore their surroundings with their keen sense of smell. Chickens develop complex social structures and constantly look out for their own family members and other chickens in the flock.
Cows' personalities are as diverse as those of cats, dogs and people: Some are bold and adventurous; others are shy and timid. Some are friendly and considerate; others are bossy and mischievous. Turkeys enjoy the company of others, love to be petted and enjoy clucking along to their favorite songs.
Just like people, dogs and cats, all of these animals value their lives and don't want to die. Pennsylvanians who support the bill to end the slaughter of dogs and cats for food should also support ending the slaughter of all animals for food, and embrace healthful and delicious vegan eating.
The writer is a PETA Foundation staff writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Inconsistent Wolf
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Watson in 33rd
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Gross in 45th
- Coal’s biggest threat
- ObamaCare solution
- Chamber’s choice
- Don’t fall for Wolf’s tax scheme