Small charitable groups hurting
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Dec. 13, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Groups like our VFWs, fire companies and fraternal organizations help our youngest to oldest residents, providing educational and social opportunities to people across the 52nd District. Many times, these groups are able to offer such assistance through proceeds from raffles and drawings.
Recently, Gov. Tom Corbett signed into law legislation that stands to prevent these organizations from carrying out their charitable works. Legislation originally drafted to help ease the burden of state regulations on small games of chance has led to the largest expansion of gambling in recent history.
Under the new law, about 4,500 taverns across Pennsylvania would be licensed to operate games such as raffles, daily drawings and pull-tabs. These establishments will be able to pay out up to $35,000 per week in prizes once reserved for our small groups.
Our small clubs and nonprofits already are facing enormous challenges in today's tough economic climate. Some have had to close their doors altogether. Unfortunately, this alarming trend could become the status quo.
But there are some bright spots in this law. Clubs that take in less than $40,000 annually may keep up to $20,000 for operating expenses, and only those with proceeds exceeding $20,000 yearly will be required to submit an annual report to the state. These regulations aim to ease burdens on our small groups as they work to stay afloat.
Deberah Kula is a Democrat representing the 52nd Legislative District.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Putin’s actions II
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Putin’s actions I
- Lebo’s coyotes