Raise minimum wage
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
Recently, there was a nationwide strike of fast-food workers. Most conservatives do not believe the minimum wage should be raised. I disagree.
Is it right to work a full-time job and have to use food stamps to make ends meet? It is the taxpayers who subsidize those who have to rely on government programs to survive.
Minimum-wage jobs are no longer just “entry level.” For many, such jobs are the only work to be found, since so many positions have gone overseas or just been eliminated. It is family breadwinners who are stuck in these jobs, as well as older workers who are too young to retire but have been downsized.
When I started in the labor force, I worked at minimum wage. But the economy was different then. There were many opportunities to grow and if you had ambition and were not afraid of hard work, you could advance. I do not think that is the case today.
In the world economy, we are all struggling for our piece of the pie. Sometimes, all that's left is crumbs. And it only will get worse as the gap between the rich and the working poor grows. Amnesty for illegal immigrants will wipe out any bargaining power to improve lower-class wages.
It is time for an increase in the minimum wage and an end to the exploitation of the working class.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Saved her life
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Metcalfe wrong
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Quit drilling in state forests
- What competition?
- About U.S. media
- Dress code
- Wildlife & humans
- Zealots’ tactic