Shallow & uninformed
In response to Gene Watson's letter “Valid comparison?” : How can anyone compare the tea party to the Taliban without so much as an inkling of what the tea party is really about?
Basing opinions on just the spew that emanates from the likes of MSNBC, the Huffington Post and most mainstream media shows how shallow and uninformed Mr. Watson really is. The tea party is more concerned with the overreach of our federal government, not with forcing any sort of religious ideology on the American people — quite a difference from the Taliban.
As for the accusation of resisting any sort of compromise, please take a hard look at the Democrats in the Senate, Mr. Watson. Slinging mud will only soil you, my friend.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Corbett better choice
- Tax hits seniors
- Wolf & ObamaCare
- Incomprehensible hatred
- Thanks to searchers
- Not one more drop
- Restore royalty minimum
- Overlooked by PUC
- Ex-Im & Westinghouse
- Despair & chaos