| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Good intentions, bad results

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

How did the world's most dynamic economy tumble into this prolonged unemployment recession with falling middle-class incomes?

It began in the 2000s when a well-intentioned Congress, believing in affordable housing for all, pressured banks to provide below-prime interest loans to people regardless of their ability to pay. This triggered the 2008 subprime meltdown of housing, the economy and the prolonged recession.

Then we twice elected as president an intelligent, charismatic, young, politically talented Harvard law graduate with no business management experience or background in economics. He believed a federal redistribution of citizen wealth was the best way to help the needy. His government spent our money for numerous stimulus programs in the misguided hope of ending the recession and putting the 8 percent unemployed back to work.

This resulted in the highest federal deficits ever and squelched the growth of our job-producing economy.

The federal government, over the years, lowered eligibility requirements for food stamps, disability and unemployment, greatly increasing these programs' costs and likelihood of fraud.

Now, to provide health insurance for the 15 percent of the population without it, ObamaCare, will disrupt the medical industry — one-sixth of our economy.

Good intentions do not necessarily mean good results. The administration's progressive economic policies have failed. We need to find better economic, political and private ways to help the poor and unemployed.

Massive government spending, redistributing wealth, new taxes and more regulations are not the answers. They de-energize the productive sector and demoralize entitlement recipients.

Ron Raymond

Buffalo Township

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Home, sweet home?
  2. End climate change
  3. March of the lemmings
  4. Another fee billed to drivers
  5. A fresh face needed
  6. Pipelines to the future
  7. Volkswagen’s ‘sin’
  8. Where’s the anger?
  9. The Vick ‘rub’
  10. Kill camera bill
  11. CO2 propaganda war